The Group of 20 nations is more capable of replicating development success models than the United Nations manages to do within its own development ranks, representing a major challenge to the UN system and its second-most important agenda item after the maintenance of peace and security. The G20 also represents other challenges to the UN development arm: in economic might, it includes all of the world’s major countries, and it makes up not only the richest nations but also the poorest big economies and therefore encompasses a wide array of development perspectives. The G20 also includes almost all of the globe’s regional heavyweights and the world’s most populous nations, giving the organization unrivaled clout.
Representing a strong global network of power, wealth, poverty and values, the G20 combines established forums of multilateralism with an informal institutional setting, allowing players to work with each other directly and to avoid the inherent UN bureaucratic baggage that can saddle projects. In short, the G20 is a better place to do business, a new report says. The study, based on an evaluation by FUNDS (which stands for the Future UN Development System), a research project of the City University of New York’s Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies, spells out that the development debate in rich countries has moved beyond aid packages and toward focusing on such pillars as education, skills training, infrastructure and food security, making the UN’s approach to development less and less relevant. Can the UN reform its structures and procedures to compete with the G20? Don’t hold your breath.
To read the full briefing, click here.