SMALL STATES - Our series exploring how the UN and others can better serve these countries →

The Post-2015 UN Development Agenda


Rosario, Carite in the Philippines
A scene from the urban municipality of Rosario in Carite Province, Philippines. JOE PENNEY

One of the success stories of the United Nations has been its capacity to serve as a forum to agree on global development goals. They include not only those set in the UN Development Decades, but also in the series of UN conferences convened since the 1970s and particularly the series of summits that started with the 1990 World Summit for Children. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which drew from the Millennium Declaration and that series of summits, and the ongoing discussions about the post-2015 UN Development Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) belong to this long tradition.

This not only shows the convening power of the UN and its character as the most representative global institution (the Security Council aside), but also its strong historical partnership with civil society. Although goal setting has helped place many new issues on the global agenda, a downside has been the weak accountability and even deficient monitoring of international commitments.

For the post-2015 process, the UN has before it two major reports: the 2012 one by a task force of UN agencies and the 2013 report of the high-level panel convened by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for this purpose. We should add his own report to the 68th (September 2013) session of the General Assembly. These reports are cited here as UN Task Force, High-Level Panel and SG Report. Also relevant are reports by the UN regional commissions and a summary of the “global conversation” organized by the UN Development Group.

To continue reading the briefing, published by FUNDS, a research project of the City University of New York’s Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies, click here

Related FUNDS articles

New Development Goals, Plus Ça Change?

The UN Development Program Should Revive What It Does Best

Unido: What Does Its Future Hold?

America and the West Should Invest More in the UN, Not Less

The G20 vs. the UN Development System: Two Rivals Heat Up

Increased Private Financing to the UN Poses Benefits and Risks

Can the UN Regional Commissions Survive?

How Bad Is It? The UN Development System Needs an Overhaul

We welcome your comments on this article.  What are your thoughts?

José Antonio Ocampo is professor of professional practice in international and public affairs and a fellow of the Committee on Global Thought at Columbia University. He is also chairman of the United Nations Committee for Development Policy. When he worked at the UN, he was under secretary-general of Economic and Social Affairs and executive secretary of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. In addition, he was a minister of finance and public credit as well as a minister of agriculture and rural development in Colombia, among other government posts. His most recent book (with Luis Bértola) is “The Economic Development of Latin America Since Independence.”

We would love your thoughts. Please comment:

The Post-2015 UN Development Agenda
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Related Posts


Global Connections Television - The only talk show of its kind in the world

Subscribe to PassBlue


Don't miss a story

Subscribe now to send the smartest news

on the UN directly to your inbox.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously