• Nikki Haley to Mahmoud Abbas: Get Over Trump’s Jerusalem Decision

    by  • February 20, 2018 • Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Nikki Haley Watch, Security Council, US Foreign Relations • 1 Comment

    Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, entering the UN Security Council on Feb. 20, 2018, for a meeting on his state; in the foreground, right, sits Jared Kushner, the White House broker for peace talks between Israel and Palestine. LOEY FELIPE/UN PHOTO

    Mahmoud Abbas, chairman of the Palestinian Authority, sticks to his well-known grievances. While Danny Danon, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, finger-points; Nikki Haley, the American envoy to the UN, warns everyone to stay off the topic of Jerusalem.

    In the latest showdown on Palestine in the UN Security Council, which welcomed Abbas and other higher-ups to join in, some of the most powerful parties in the room pushed the two-state solution to the Palestine-Israeli conflict further into the abyss.

    Yet outside the Council, reporters threw questions at ambassadors as they trickled out of the meeting about a possible peace plan announcement. The Russian ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, paused to say that something was “cooking,” without elaborating.

    Jared Kushner, who has been tasked by his father-in-law, President Trump, to broker a peace deal between the Israelis and Palestinians, attended the Council event with Jason Greenblatt, the White House envoy to the Middle East. When they exited the Council after spending hours in open and closed meetings, Kushner was asked if an announcement was imminent.

    “Oh, yeah,” Kushner said, smiling and touching this reporter’s arm as if he were offering a condolence. When will it be announced, he was asked, responding, “When the time is right!”

    It turns out that Kushner and Greenblatt told Council members in the closed session that they had a peace plan but provided no hints of what it entailed, according to a diplomat who was at the meeting. That did not stop the Americans from requesting that the Council agree to approve the plan when it comes out.

    Abbas, who spoke at the open session before Israel and the United States took their turns, proposed to hold talks in an international forum, away from Washington, in mid-2018.

    “We met with the President of the United States, Donald Trump, four times in 2017, and we have expressed our absolute readiness to reach a historic peace agreement,” Abbas said, after a history digression, starting with the Balfour Declaration of 1917.

    “We repeatedly reaffirmed our position in accordance with international law, the relevant UN resolutions and the two-state solution on the basis of the 1967 borders. Yet this administration has not clarified its position.” (Abbas did not reveal what Trump said in the four meetings.)

    Expressing more frustration, Abbas echoed what has confounded many people who track the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Trump’s endorsement of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

    The decision, announced in early December by Trump, not only contravenes international law under Security Council resolutions, but it has also shut down negotiations for a two-state solution to begin to mend the Middle East.

    Indeed, despite hundreds of UN resolutions incorporating the goal of two independent states, for Palestine and for Israel, the opportunity is now unattainable, said a Middle East diplomat after the Council session, noting scant mention of a two-state solution by the US in its speech.

    “Is it for the two-state solution or for one-state?” Abbas continued, regarding the US position.

    If there were answers to Abbas’s question, they were not ironed out at the Council. It was crowded with pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian advocates as well as many ambassadors of UN member nations, everyone eager to grasp at straws.

    Danon took a low road, using his speech to castigate Abbas personally for the standoff in the conflict, pointing his arm at the Palestinian delegation several times, as Riyad Mansour, the ambassador of Palestine to the UN, sat across from Danon at the Council’s horseshoe table, not looking at him. (Abbas had left the room by then.)

    “You have made it clear, with your words and with your actions, that you are no longer part of the solution,” Danon began. “You are the problem. You just addressed the members of the Security Council and spoke of your commitments to peace. This is what you often do when speaking to international forums, but, when you address your people, you convey a very different message.”

    Haley spoke after Danon, tossing out a barbed remark: “We are joined here today by Palestinian Authority President Abbas. I’m sorry he declined to stay in the chamber to hear the remarks of others. Even though he has left the room, I will address the balance of my remarks to him.”

    Abbas had left the room to participate in a scheduled “meet and greet” with ambassadors at the UN, but his departure could have been timed to coincide with Danon reading his speech next.

    “I sit here today offering the outstretched hand of the United States to the Palestinian people in the cause of peace,” Haley said, after reciting a laundry list of problems in the Middle East.

    “The Palestinian leadership has a choice to make between two different paths” — “the path of absolutist demands, hateful rhetoric and incitement to violence. . . . Or, there is the path of negotiation and compromise.”

    Then, veering to the hypersensitive topic of Jerusalem, Haley said: “The United States knows the Palestinian leadership was very unhappy with the decision to move our embassy to Jerusalem. You don’t have to like that decision. You don’t have to praise it. You don’t even have to accept it. But know this: that decision will not change.”

    This is the first time the Council has publicly discussed the controversial Jerusalem announcement by the US since December. Jerusalem has always been hotly contested by the Israelis and the Palestinians, who both claim the city as their spiritual and historical home.

    On Dec. 8, Britain and France called for an emergency meeting of the Council to voice its concerns over the decision by the US on Jerusalem. Later in December, a Security Council resolution, submitted by Egypt, called on Washington to reverse itself on Jerusalem. Fourteen of the 15 Council members supported the resolution, forcing US to cast its first veto in six years. On Dec. 21, the General Assembly passed a resolution to negate the American endorsement of Jerusalem, forcing another US veto. The resolution — more symbolic than actionable — passed with 128 yes votes, 9 against, 35 abstentions and 21 absences.

    Since Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, some members of the US administration have sought to temper the change. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the move would take years to be accomplished, but Vice President Mike Pence, visiting the region in January, said it would be done by the end of 2019. Trump said this month that Jerusalem remained off the negotiating table.

    [The US State Department said in response to Abbas’s speech that “he kept his remarks constructive.”]

    In her speech, Haley noted that US negotiators who were ready to talk peace with the Palestinians happened to be sitting behind her, as Kushner and Greenblatt responded motionless. She did not mention the phrase “two-state solution” — what Palestine and its supporters in the Council wanted to hear.

    It was António Guterres, the UN secretary-general, who, speaking first at the Council session, confirmed what was to become clear in the speechifying ahead. “After decades of support, the global consensus for a two-state solution could be eroding,” he said.

    [This article was updated to reflect that Abbas left the Council session just before Danon spoke.]

    Don’t Miss a Story: Subscribe to PassBlue

    Sign up to get the smartest news on the UN by email, joining readers across the globe.

    We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously

    Dulcie Leimbach

    About

    Dulcie Leimbach was a fellow of the Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies at the Graduate Center of CUNY from 2012 to 2017. She is the founder of PassBlue, for which she edits and writes, covering primarily the United Nations, West Africa, peacekeeping operations and women's issues. For PassBlue and other publications, she has reported from New York and overseas from West Africa (Burkina Faso, Mali and Senegal) as well as from Europe (Scotland, Sicily, Vienna, Budapest, Kyiv, Armenia and The Hague). She has provided commentary on the UN for BBC World Radio and Background Briefing with Ian Masters/KPFK Radio in Los Angeles.

    Previously, she was an editor for the Coalition for the UN Convention Against Corruption; from 2008 to 2011, she was the publications director of the United Nations Association of the USA, where she edited its flagship magazine, The InterDependent, and migrated it online in 2010. She was also the senior editor of UNA's annual book, "A Global Agenda: Issues Before the UN." She has also worked as an editorial consultant to various UN agencies.

    Before UNA, Leimbach was an editor at The New York Times for more than 20 years, editing and writing for most sections of the paper, including the Magazine, Book Review and Op-Ed. She began her reporting career in small-town papers in San Diego, Calif., and Colorado, graduating to the Rocky Mountain News in Denver before she worked in New York at Esquire magazine and Adweek. In between, she was a Wall Street foreign-exchange dealer. Leimbach has been a fellow at Yaddo, the artists' colony in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.; taught news reporting at Hofstra University; and was a guest lecturer at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. She graduated from the University of Colorado and has an M.F.A. in writing from Warren Wilson College in North Carolina. She grew up mostly in Oyster Bay and Huntington, Long Island, where her family moved a dozen times, ending up in Santa Barbara, Calif. Her first exposure to the UN was at age 8, on a summer Sunday visit with her mother and sisters, where she was awed by the gift shop. Leimbach now lives in Brooklyn, N.Y.

    One Response to Nikki Haley to Mahmoud Abbas: Get Over Trump’s Jerusalem Decision

    1. Bill Buchanan
      February 22, 2018 at 3:45 am

      President Trump, Nicki Haley and Jared Kushner equals a holy or unholy trinity depending on your point of view. None of them live in the Palestine/Israeli region.
      On the other hand Mahmoud Abbas does live there and Jerusalem is a holy site to the Palestinians and to the Israelis.
      Sometimes it seems that God (the same God they both profess to believe in) has forsaken them. One would hope, albeit hopelessly, that they could sit down together and resolve their problems without the conflicting interests of other countries (within or without that well known oxymoron, the United Nations)intervening.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.